Patrick M. Bossuyt: h-index, Total Citations, and Citation Map
Patrick M. Bossuyt's h-index is 193 (884 i10-index, 353,655+ total citations across 1,000+ publications) according to Google Scholar as of July 2026. Patrick M. Bossuyt is affiliated with University of Amsterdam.
Patrick M. Bossuyt is a researcher affiliated with University of Amsterdam, specializing in Clinical Epidemiology, Evaluation of Tests and Biomarkers. Their work has been cited 353,655 times. This profile visualizes their global influence, spanning a global audience.
Patrick M. Bossuyt's Citation Metrics
Bibliometric impact based on 1,000 indexed publications. Of these, 18 are original research articles — the rest are literature highlights, conference abstracts or theses.
- H-Index
- 193
- i10-Index
- 884
- Total Citations
- 353,655
- Citing Countries
- 0
As of July 2026.
Patrick M. Bossuyt has an h-index of 193 and 353,655 total citations across 1000 publications, with research cited by institutions in 0 countries.
Download Exports (PNG, CSV, Poster)
Free Viewing Patrick M. Bossuyt's citation map is always free. Pay once to download poster, PNG, and CSV files for offline use or your visa packet.
Global Impact Map
Visualizing the geographic distribution of institutions that have cited your work.
Starting…
Pins will appear here as institutions are resolved — no need to refresh.
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021166,780
Top Citing Countries
Top Citing Institutions
No institution data available.
Citation trend (last 10 years)Click to expand
Citation Trend (Last 10 Years)
Related Guides
Learn how to use citation maps for your research and visa applications.
About Patrick M. Bossuyt's research
Patrick M. Bossuyt is a researcher in Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation of Tests and Biomarkers at University of Amsterdam. Their work has been cited 353,655 times across 1,000 publications (h-index 193), according to Google Scholar.
Their most-cited work, “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews” (2021), has accumulated 166,780 citations. Other influential works include “QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies” (2011) with 15,245 citations and “Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative” (2003) with 6,440 citations.
